l演讲稿模板（16篇范文）

l演讲稿 模板1

阅读小贴士：模板1共计9370个字，预计阅读时长24分钟。朗读需要47分钟，中速朗读63分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要86分钟，有243位用户喜欢。

the ballot or the bullet

by malcolm _

april 3, 1964

cleveland, ohio

mr. moderator, brother loma_, brothers and sisters, friends and enemies: i just can"t believe everyone in here is a friend, and i don"t want to leave anybody out. the question tonight, as i understand it, is "the negro revolt, and where do we go from here?" or what ne_t?" in my little humble way of understanding it, it points toward either the ballot or the bullet.

before we try and e_plain what is meant by the ballot or the bullet, i would like to clarify something concerning myself. i"m still a muslim; my religion is still islam. that"s my personal belief. just as adam clayton powell is a christian minister who heads the abyssinian baptist church in new york, but at the same time takes part in the political struggles to try and bring about rights to the black people in this country; and dr. martin luther king is a christian minister down in atlanta, georgia, who heads another organization fighting for the civil rights of black people in this country; and reverend galamison, i guess you"ve heard of him, is another christian minister in new york who has been deeply involved in the school s to eliminate segregated education; well, i myself am a minister, not a christian minister, but a muslim minister; and i believe in action on all fronts by whatever means necessary.

although i"m still a muslim, i"m not here tonight to discuss my religion. i"m not here to try and change your religion. i"m not here to argue or discuss anything that we differ about, because it"s time for us to submerge our differences and realize that it is best for us to first see that we have the same problem, a common problem, a problem that will make you catch hell whether you"re a baptist, or a methodist, or a muslim, or a nationalist. whether you"re educated or illiterate, whether you live on the boulevard or in the alley, you"re going to catch hell just like i am. we"re all in the same boat and we all are going to catch the same hell from the same man. he just happens to be a white man. all of us have suffered here, in this country, political oppression at the hands of the white man, economic e_ploitation at the hands of the white man, and social degradation at the hands of the white man.

now in speaking like this, it doesn"t mean that we"re anti-white, but it does mean we"re anti-e_ploitation, we"re anti-degradation, we"re anti-oppression. and if the white man doesn"t want us to be anti-him, let him stop oppressing and e_ploiting and degrading us. whether we are christians or muslims or nationalists or agnostics or atheists, we must first learn to forget our differences. if we have differences, let us differ in the closet; when we come out in front, let us not have anything to argue about until we get finished arguing with the man. if the late president kennedy could get together with khrushchev and e_change some wheat, we certainly have more in common with each other than kennedy and khrushchev had with each other.

if we don"t do something real soon, i think you"ll have to agree that we"re going to be forced either to use the ballot or the bullet. it"s one or the other in 1964. it isn"t that time is running out -- time has run out!

1964 threatens to be the most e_plosive year america has ever witnessed. the most e_plosive year. why? it"s also a political year. it"s the year when all of the white politicians will be back in the so-called negro community jiving you and me for some votes. the year when all of the white political crooks will be right back in your and my community with their false promises, building up our hopes for a letdown, with their trickery and their treachery, with their false promises which they don"t intend to keep. as they nourish these dissatisfactions, it can only lead to one thing, an e_plosion; and now we have the type of black man on the scene in america today -- i"m sorry, brother loma_ -- who just doesn"t intend to turn the other cheek any longer.

don"t let anybody tell you anything about the odds are against you. if they draft you, they send you to korea and make you face 800 million chinese. if you can be brave over there, you can be brave right here. these odds aren"t as great as those odds. and if you fight here, you will at least know what you"re fighting for.

i"m not a politician, not even a student of politics; in fact, i"m not a student of much of anything. i"m not a democrat. i"m not a republican, and i don"t even consider myself an american. if you and i were americans, there"d be no problem. those honkies that just got off the boat, they"re already americans; polacks are already americans; the italian refugees are already americans. everything that came out of europe, every blue-eyed thing, is already an american. and as long as you and i have been over here, we aren"t americans yet.

well, i am one who doesn"t believe in deluding myself. i"m not going to sit at your table and watch you eat, with nothing on my plate, and call myself a diner. sitting at the table doesn"t make you a diner, unless you eat some of what"s on that plate. being here in america doesn"t make you an american. being born here in america doesn"t make you an american. why, if birth made you american, you wouldn"t need any legislation; you wouldn"t need any amendments to the constitution; you wouldn"t be faced with civil-rights filibustering in washington, d.c., right now. they don"t have to pass civil-rights legislation to make a polack an american.

no, i"m not an american. i"m one of the 22 million black people who are the victims of americanism. one of the 22 million black people who are the victims of democracy, nothing but disguised hypocrisy. so, i"m not standing here speaking to you as an american, or a patriot, or a flag-saluter, or a flag-waver -- no, not i. i"m speaking as a victim of this american system. and i see america through the eyes of the victim. i don"t see any american dream; i see an american nightmare.

these 22 million victims are waking up. their eyes are coming open. they"re beginning to see what they used to only look at. they"re becoming politically mature. they are realizing that there are new political trends from coast to coast. as they see these new political trends, it"s possible for them to see that every time there"s an election the races are so close that they have to have a recount. they had to recount in massachusetts to see who was going to be governor, it was so close. it was the same way in rhode island, in minnesota, and in many other parts of the country. and the same with kennedy and ni_on when they ran for president. it was so close they had to count all over again. well, what does this mean? it means that when white people are evenly divided, and black people have a bloc of votes of their own, it is left up to them to determine who"s going to sit in the white house and who"s going to be in the dog house.

lt. was the black man"s vote that put the present administration in washington, d.c. your vote, your dumb vote, your ignorant vote, your wasted vote put in an administration in washington, d.c., that has seen fit to pass every kind of legislation imaginable, saving you until last, then filibustering on top of that. and your and my leaders have the audacity to run around clapping their hands and talk about how much progress we"re making. and what a good president we have. if he wasn"t good in te_as, he sure can"t be good in washington, d.c. because te_as is a lynch state. it is in the same breath as mississippi, no different; only they lynch you in te_as with a te_as accent and lynch you in mississippi with a mississippi accent. and these negro leaders have the audacity to go and have some coffee in the white house with a te_an, a southern cracker -- that"s all he is -- and then come out and tell you and me that he"s going to be better for us because, since he"s from the south, he knows how to deal with the southerners. what kind of logic is that? let eastland be president, he"s from the south too. he should be better able to deal with them than johnson.

in this present administration they have in the house of representatives 257 democrats to only 177 republicans. they control two-thirds of the house vote. why can"t they pass something that will help you and me? in the senate, there are 67 senators who are of the democratic party. only 33 of them are republicans. why, the democrats have got the government sewed up, and you"re the one who sewed it up for them. and what have they given you for it? four years in office, and just now getting around to some civil-rights legislation. just now, after everything else is gone, out of the way, they"re going to sit down now and play with you all summer long -- the same old giant con game that they call filibuster. all those are in cahoots together. don"t you ever think they"re not in cahoots together, for the man that is heading the civil-rights filibuster is a man from georgia named richard russell. when johnson became president, the first man he asked for when he got back to washington, d.c., was "dicky" -- that"s how tight they are. that"s his boy, that"s his pal, that"s his buddy. but they"re playing that old con game. one of them makes believe he"s for you, and he"s got it fi_ed where the other one is so tight against you, he never has to keep his promise.

so it"s time in 1964 to wake up. and when you see them coming up with that kind of conspiracy, let them know your eyes are open. and let them know you -- something else that"s wide open too. it"s got to be the ballot or the bullet. the ballot or the bullet. if you"re afraid to use an e_pression like that, you should get on out of the country; you should get back in the cotton patch; you should get back in the alley. they get all the negro vote, and after they get it, the negro gets nothing in return. all they did when they got to washington was give a few big negroes big jobs. those big negroes didn"t need big jobs, they already had jobs. that"s camouflage, that"s trickery, that"s treachery, window-dressing. i"m not trying to knock out the democrats for the republicans. we"ll get to them in a minute. but it is true; you put the democrats first and the democrats put you last.

look at it the way it is. what alibis do they use, since they control congress and the senate? what alibi do they use when you and i ask, "well, when are you going to keep your promise?" they blame the di_iecrats. what is a di_iecrat? a democrat. a di_iecrat is nothing but a democrat in disguise. the titular head of the democrats is also the head of the di_iecrats, because the di_iecrats are a part of the democratic party. the democrats have never kicked the di_iecrats out of the party. the di_iecrats bolted themselves once, but the democrats didn"t put them out. imagine, these lowdown southern segregationists put the northern democrats down. but the northern democrats have never put the di_iecrats down. no, look at that thing the way it is. they have got a con game going on, a political con game, and you and i are in the middle. it"s time for you and me to wake up and start looking at it like it is, and trying to understand it like it is; and then we can deal with it like it is.

the di_iecrats in washington, d.c., control the key committees that run the government. the only reason the di_iecrats control these committees is because they have seniority. the only reason they have seniority is because they come from states where negroes can"t vote. this is not even a government that"s based on democracy. lt. is not a government that is made up of representatives of the people. half of the people in the south can"t even vote. eastland is not even supposed to be in washington. half of the senators and congressmen who occupy these key positions in washington, d.c., are there illegally, are there unconstitutionally.

i was in washington, d.c., a week ago thursday, when they were debating whether or not they should let the bill come onto the floor. and in the back of the room where the senate meets, there"s a huge map of the united states, and on that map it shows the location of negroes throughout the country. and it shows that the southern section of the country, the states that are most heavily concentrated with negroes, are the ones that have senators and congressmen standing up filibustering and doing all other kinds of trickery to keep the negro from being able to vote. this is pitiful. but it"s not pitiful for us any longer; it"s actually pitiful for the white man, because soon now, as the negro awakens a little more and sees the vise that he"s in, sees the bag that he"s in, sees the real game that he"s in, then the negro"s going to develop a new tactic.

these senators and congressmen actually violate the constitutional amendments that guarantee the people of that particular state or county the right to vote. and the constitution itself has within it the machinery to e_pel any representative from a state where the voting rights of the people are violated. you don"t even need new legislation. any person in congress right now, who is there from a state or a district where the voting rights of the people are violated, that particular person should be e_pelled from congress. and when you e_pel him, you"ve removed one of the obstacles in the path of any real meaningful legislation in this country. in fact, when you e_pel them, you don"t need new legislation, because they will be replaced by black representatives from counties and districts where the black man is in the majority, not in the minority.

if the black man in these southern states had his full voting rights, the key di_iecrats in washington, d. c., which means the key democrats in washington, d.c., would lose their seats. the democratic party itself would lose its power. it would cease to be powerful as a party. when you see the amount of power that would be lost by the democratic party if it were to lose the di_iecrat wing, or branch, or element, you can see where it"s against the interests of the democrats to give voting rights to negroes in states where the democrats have been in complete power and authority ever since the civil war. you just can"t belong to that party without analyzing it.

i say again, i"m not anti-democrat, i"m not anti-republican, i"m not anti-anything. i"m just questioning their sincerity, and some of the strategy that they"ve been using on our people by promising them promises that they don"t intend to keep. when you keep the democrats in power, you"re keeping the di_iecrats in power. i doubt that my good brother loma_ will deny that. a vote for a democrat is a vote for a di_iecrat. that"s why, in 1964, it"s time now for you and me to become more politically mature and realize what the ballot is for; what we"re supposed to get when we cast a ballot; and that if we don"t cast a ballot, it"s going to end up in a situation where we"re going to have to cast a bullet. it"s either a ballot or a bullet.

in the north, they do it a different way. they have a system that"s known as gerrymandering, whatever that means. it means when negroes become too heavily concentrated in a certain area, and begin to gain too much political power, the white man comes along and changes the district lines. you may say, "why do you keep saying white man?" because it"s the white man who does it. i haven"t ever seen any negro changing any lines. they don"t let him get near the line. it"s the white man who does this. and usually, it"s the white man who grins at you the most, and pats you on the back, and is supposed to be your friend. he may be friendly, but he"s not your friend.

so, what i"m trying to impress upon you, in essence, is this: you and i in america are faced not with a segregationist conspiracy, we"re faced with a government conspiracy. everyone who"s filibustering is a senator -- that"s the government. everyone who"s finagling in washington, d.c., is a congressman -- that"s the government. you don"t have anybody putting blocks in your path but people who are a part of the government. the same government that you go abroad to fight for and die for is the government that is in a conspiracy to deprive you of your voting rights, deprive you of your economic opportunities, deprive you of decent housing, deprive you of decent education. you don"t need to go to the employer alone, it is the government itself, the government of america, that is responsible for the oppression and e_ploitation and degradation of black people in this country. and you should drop it in their lap. this government has failed the negro. this so-called democracy has failed the negro. and all these white liberals have definitely failed the negro.

so, where do we go from here? first, we need some friends. we need some new allies. the entire civil-rights struggle needs a new interpretation, a broader interpretation. we need to look at this civil-rights thing from another angle -- from the inside as well as from the outside. to those of us whose philosophy is black nationalism, the only way you can get involved in the civil-rights struggle is give it a new interpretation. that old interpretation e_cluded us. it kept us out. so, we"re giving a new interpretation to the civil-rights struggle, an interpretation that will enable us to come into it, take part in it. and these handkerchief-heads who have been dillydallying and pussy footing and compromising -- we don"t intend to let them pussyfoot and dillydally and compromise any longer.

how can you thank a man for giving you what"s already yours? how then can you thank him for giving you only part of what"s already yours? you haven"t even made progress, if what"s being given to you, you should have had already. that"s not progress. and i love my brother loma_, the way he pointed out we"re right back where we were in 1954. we"re not even as far up as we were in 1954. we"re behind where we were in 1954. there"s more segregation now than there was in 1954. there"s more racial animosity, more racial hatred, more racial violence today in 1964, than there was in 1954. where is the progress?

and now you"re facing a situation where the young negro"s coming up. they don"t want to hear that "turn the-other-cheek" stuff, no. in jacksonville, those were teenagers, they were throwing molotov cocktails. negroes have never done that before. but it shows you there"s a new deal coming in. there"s new thinking coming in. there"s new strategy coming in. it"ll be molotov cocktails this month, hand grenades ne_t month, and something else ne_t month. it"ll be ballots, or it"ll be bullets. it"ll be liberty, or it will be death. the only difference about this kind of death -- it"ll be reciprocal. you know what is meant by "reciprocal"? that"s one of brother loma_"s words. i stole it from him. i don"t usually deal with those big words because i don"t usually deal with big people. i deal with small people. i find you can get a whole lot of small people and whip hell out of a whole lot of big people. they haven"t got anything to lose, and they"ve got every thing to gain. and they"ll let you know in a minute: "it takes two to tango; when i go, you go."

the black nationalists, those whose philosophy is black nationalism, in bringing about this new interpretation of the entire meaning of civil rights, look upon it as meaning, as brother loma_ has pointed out, equality of opportunity. well, we"re justified in seeking civil rights, if it means equality of opportunity, because all we"re doing there is trying to collect for our investment. our mothers and fathers invested sweat and blood. three hundred and ten years we worked in this country without a dime in return -- i mean without a dime in return. you let the white man walk around here talking about how rich this country is, but you never stop to think how it got rich so quick. it got rich because you made it rich.

you take the people who are in this audience right now. they"re poor. we"re all poor as individuals. our weekly salary individually amounts to hardly anything. but if you take the salary of everyone in here collectively, it"ll fill up a whole lot of baskets. it"s a lot of wealth. if you can collect the wages of just these people right here for a year, you"ll be rich -- richer than rich. when you look at it like that, think how rich uncle sam had to become, not with this handful, but millions of black people. your and my mother and father, who didn"t work an eight-hour shift, but worked from "can"t see" in the morning until "can"t see" at night, and worked for nothing, making the white man rich, making uncle sam rich. this is our investment. this is our contribution, our blood.

not only did we give of our free labor, we gave of our blood. every time he had a call to arms, we were the first ones in uniform. we died on every battlefield the white man had. we have made a greater sacrifice than anybody who"s standing up in america today. we have made a greater contribution and have collected less. civil rights, for those of us whose philosophy is black nationalism, means: "give it to us now. don"t wait for ne_t year. give it to us yesterday, and that"s not fast enough."

i might stop right here to point out one thing. whenever you"re going after something that belongs to you, anyone who"s depriving you of the right to have it is a criminal. understand that. whenever you are going after something that is yours, you are within your legal rights to lay claim to it. and anyone who puts forth any effort to deprive you of that which is yours, is breaking the law, is a criminal. and this was pointed out by the supreme court decision. it outlawed segregation.

which means segregation is against the law. which means a segregationist is breaking the law. a segregationist is a criminal. you can"t label him as anything other than that. and when you demonstrate against segregation, the law is on your side. the supreme court is on your side.

now, who is it that opposes you in carrying out the law? the police department itself. with police dogs and clubs. whenever you demonstrate against segregation, whether it is segregated education, segregated housing, or anything else, the law is on your side, and anyone who stands in the way is not the law any longer. they are breaking the law; they are not representatives of the law. any time you demonstrate against segregation and a man has the audacity to put a police dog on you, kill that dog, kill him, i"m telling you, kill that dog. i say it, if they put me in jail tomorrow, kill that dog. then you"ll put a stop to it. now, if these white people in here don"t want to see that kind of action, get down and tell the mayor to tell the police department to pull the dogs in. that"s all you have to do. if you don"t do it, someone else will.

if you don"t take this kind of stand, your little children will grow up and look at you and think "shame." if you don"t take an uncompromising stand, i don"t mean go out and get violent; but at the same time you should never be nonviolent unless you run into some nonviolence. i"m nonviolent with those who are nonviolent with me. but when you drop that violence on me, then you"ve made me go insane, and i"m not responsible for what i do. and that"s the way every negro should get. any time you know you"re within the law, within your legal rights, within your moral rights, in accord with justice, then die for what you believe in. but don"t die alone. let your dying be reciprocal. this is what is meant by equality. what"s good for the goose is good for the gander.

when we begin to get in this area, we need new friends, we need new allies. we need to e_pand the civil-rights struggle to a higher level -- to the level of human rights. whenever you are in a civil-rights struggle, whether you know it or not, you are confining yourself to the jurisdiction of uncle sam. no one from the outside world can speak out in your behalf as long as your struggle is a civil-rights struggle. civil rights comes within the domestic affairs of this country. all of our african brothers and our asian brothers and our latin-american brothers cannot open their mouths and interfere in the domestic affairs of the united states. and as long as it"s civil rights, this comes under the jurisdiction of uncle sam.

but the united nations has what"s known as the charter of human rights; it has a committee that deals in human rights. you may wonder why all of the atrocities that have been committed in africa and in hungary and in asia, and in latin america are brought before the un, and the negro problem is never brought before the un. this is part of the conspiracy. this old, tricky blue eyed liberal who is supposed to be your and my friend, supposed to be in our corner, supposed to be subsidizing our struggle, and supposed to be acting in the capacity of an adviser, never tells you anything about human rights. they keep you wrapped up in civil rights. and you spend so much time barking up the civil-rights tree, you don"t even know there"s a human-rights tree on the same floor.

when you e_pand the civil-rights struggle to the level of human rights, you can then take the case of the black man in this country before the nations in the un. you can take it before the general assembly. you can take uncle sam before a world court. but the only level you can do it on is the level of human rights. civil rights keeps you under his restrictions, under his jurisdiction. civil rights keeps you in his pocket. civil rights means you"re asking uncle sam to treat you right. human rights are something you were born with. human rights are your god-given rights. human rights are the rights that are recognized by all nations of this earth. and any time any one violates your human rights, you can take them to the world court.

uncle sam"s hands are dripping with blood, dripping with the blood of the black man in this country. he"s the earth"s number-one hypocrite. he has the audacity -- yes, he has -- imagine him posing as the leader of the free world. the free world! and you over here singing "we shall overcome." e_pand the civil-rights struggle to the level of human rights. take it into the united nations, where our african brothers can throw their weight on our side, where our asian brothers can throw their weight on our side, where our latin-american brothers can throw their weight on our side, and where 800 million chinamen are sitting there waiting to throw their weight on our side.

let the world know how bloody his hands are. let the world know the hypocrisy that"s practiced over here. let it be the ballot or the bullet. let him know that it must be the ballot or the bullet.

l演讲稿 模板2

阅读小贴士：模板2共计364个字，预计阅读时长1分钟。朗读需要2分钟，中速朗读3分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要4分钟，有134位用户喜欢。

my beloved teacher演讲稿

sara, who comes from canada, is our oral english teacher. she is loved and respected by many students. what influences me most is that she is warm-hearted, generous and easy-going. she always stays optimistic and tries hard to understand every of her student. besides, she often tells us some interesting stories and jokes in class, so as to make a happy atmosphere for us to study english. she loves teaching so much and has the eagerness to devote her life to education. because of her outstanding achievements, she had won lots of rewards, one of which is "model teacher" prize.

萨拉是我们的英语口语老师,她来自加拿大。很多学生都很尊敬和喜爱她。她给我的最深刻的影响是她的热情、慷慨又随和的"性格。萨拉总是很乐观,不断地努力了解每一个学生。她还会在课上给我讲有趣的故事和笑话,所以她教的英语课都很轻松有趣。她喜爱教学工作,渴望一生都献身教育事业。因为她的优秀表现,她获得了许多奖项,其中有模范教师奖。

l演讲稿 模板3

阅读小贴士：模板3共计802个字，预计阅读时长3分钟。朗读需要5分钟，中速朗读6分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要8分钟，有132位用户喜欢。

the college竞职演讲

how can i ever forget the beautiful campus in africa？

the grounds were covered with dark green grass through which stretched a straight white stone path. on both sides of the path were planted what i believed to be poinsettias. now the flowers were surrounded by pinkish leaves instead of bright red ones as they should have been. trimmed with light green edges，the leaves looked delicate and charming. along the long path i often took a stroll which world take me to a wide terrace，where i could watch the enchanting glow of sunset，and occasionally catch the sight of a train puffing and hooting on its way southward. on my way back i would pass by the laboratory and library building whose large french windows had soft curtains let fall to the floor. just outside the windows kapod flowers glowed red in full bloom. a short way off stood the dining hall，where i found a tree bearing snow-white blossoms so graceful and soft to the touch. viewed together from the distance，they were as beautiful as a bridal veil. later i learned that it was a tree called datura which i had so often read about in books.

in the centre of the campus was a newly-built fan-shaped fountain. a number of chinese taihu rocks were arranged in it with a touch of artistry. and there was a story behind it.

in the courtyard of the hose where chinese teachers were living，there was also a similar but much smaller fountain looking like potted landscape. it was built by the chinese teachers who had come earlier in their spare time. they had graced it with water plants and goldfish. perhaps out of a yearning for their homeland，they had even engraved on a taihu rock four chinese characters："er quan ying yue"meaning"two springs reflecting the moonlight."these characters were painted red and written in an ancient calligraphic style. the homesick chinese teachers seemed to feel that at the sight of these characters，they could by a flight of the imagination bring to their presence a native moon smilingly beaming over west lake.

one day the president of the college came to visit the chinese teachers. delighted by the beauty of their fountain he asked them to design another one for the college. thus in the centre of the campus，in a field of green grass and colorful flowers appeared a new chinese fountain spurting out water drops glistening in the sunlight.

l演讲稿 模板4

阅读小贴士：模板4共计1111个字，预计阅读时长3分钟。朗读需要6分钟，中速朗读8分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要11分钟，有101位用户喜欢。

one world , one dream .简简单单的四个词却始终牵动着一个古老的东方文明古国——中国之魂。

2024．奥林匹克精神，即将在这里盛放！

几十年，风云变幻，斗转星移，一个民族，一个国家，一个世界，一个梦想，在这里，不会变。这个梦，像一个种子，它有根，伸展在中华九百六十万平方公里的土地里。这个梦，像一只凤凰，它有绚丽的翅膀，飞翔在华夏十三亿儿女的眸子里。这个梦，像一条蛟龙，它有一种精神，奔腾在湍流不息的江海里。这种精神，一种能鼓舞人奋发进取的精神；这种精神，中国奥运精神，正是顺应时代潮流，应运而生。它是以往精神瑰宝的继承和发扬，是中华民族的宝藏，是对中华五千年文化的提炼。

中国奥运精神内涵丰富，首先它是最深厚，最基本的爱国主义精神。1932年，在爱国将领张学良的资助下，刘长春只身漂泊海上21天，到达洛杉机。在男子一百米预赛中，一路领先，然而疲惫不堪的刘长春，还是被遗憾淘汰，1936年柏林奥运会，进入撑杆跳决赛的中国运动员竟买不起比赛用杆，1948年，伦敦奥运会中国代表团是参赛团中唯一住不起奥运村的。这不堪回首的一页，早已被我们翻过。在1979年，中国恢复了在国际奥委会上的合法席位。1984年7月29日，许海峰的一声枪响实现了中国奥运金牌史上零的突破。正是在这样的历史大背景下，人民的爱国之情，强国之梦与体育精神密不可分的结合在一起。终于2024年奥林匹克盛会选择了北京，选择了中国。这也是对深爱着祖国的华夏儿女最崇高的奖赏。

中国奥运精神更是顽强，拼搏，永不言败的精神。不能忘记，上个世纪80年代，女排精神带给人们的巨大鼓舞，怎能忘记雅典奥运金牌榜上，中国代表团挤身前三甲。五星红旗一次又一次升起，国歌声一遍又一遍奏响。同样不曾忘记的是八年前的蒙特卡罗，两千年奥运会主办城的投票现场的一幕：投票前，由12名与我年龄相近的女孩代表北京演唱了《茉莉花》；那歌声很美，很动人。然而，我永远难忘的确是在北京落选时，她们放声大哭的情景。那一次，北京输了。但，我们从不曾放弃。正如奥林匹克精神所号召的那样"the most important thing is not to win, but to take part; just as the most important thing in our life is not principle, but struggle。

这就奥运精神，也正是我们世世代代炎黄子孙的魂！

2024，让我们共同期盼，让我们追寻，让我们一起为之奋斗！

2024，让我们乘着科技，人文的祥云，点燃心中之火，闪耀一段历史。

2024, 让我们付出，让我们分享，让我们所有的朋友，我们一起，将世界凝成一朵璀璨的花。

2024, one world one dream！朋友们，让我们携起手来吧！伴着这华彩的乐章，共同高歌一曲——《new beijing，great olympics》！

头一次参加演讲比赛，陌生、紧张也伴着激动，感觉有挑战性，我喜欢。

这关于奥运的演讲稿，也许更多的人会用到吧？拿来和大家一起分享~不要版权，哈哈~~不用谢哦！

l演讲稿 模板5

阅读小贴士：模板5共计1060个字，预计阅读时长3分钟。朗读需要6分钟，中速朗读8分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要10分钟，有249位用户喜欢。

敬爱的老师，亲爱的同学们：

大家好！今天我们演讲的题目是《责任伴随我们的人生》。

dear teachers and fellow students. good morning! today the topic of our speech is : responsibilities in our life.

明朝名医李时珍，三十八岁就已享誉盛名。但他却毅然离开王府，辞别太医院，在风雨严寒中跋山涉水，采集草药。终于在晚年写出《本草纲目》。因为他明白——他的责任是悬壶济世！

li shizhen, a doctor in the ming dynasty, had already enjoyed a good reputation at the age of 38. but he resolutely left the palace and resigned from the imperial hospital. then he travelled the lands and lakes to collect herbs and wasn"t afraid of the cold, wind, or storm. he finally wrote the compendium of materia medica in his latter years. he understood that it was his responsibility to cure the sick!

在我们周围，经常看到这样的景象：值日生总会留在班级，把灯、门窗关好才走；班长总是尽职尽责的为班级的大小事情服务；课代表们认真的收发各科作业，不辞辛苦的将一垛垛高高的作业从楼上搬到楼下；班主任细致的管理班级事务，关注着每一个学生。他们的行为表达方式不一样，但都可以用同一个词来描述，那就是：承担责任。

around here, such is a common sight: students always stay in class; the lights, doors and windows are closed before they leave; the class leader always serves the class with due diligence. class representatives diligently send and receive each group"s work；they take pains to move a tall stack of paper up and down the stairs; the homeroom teacher carefully manages class affairs, paying close attention to each student silently. they behave in different ways, but they can all be described with the same words: carrying one"s own responsibility.

想想我们的生活中，无时无刻不充满了责任。不同的角色也有着不同的责任。当你做为一名学生，勤奋学习便是责任；作为子女，孝敬父母便是责任；作为朋友，相互关心，便是责任……同时，我相信，责任它也决不是一个挂在嘴边的空泛的口号而已。在我眼中，责任不应该是一种客观要求的行为，而更应是一种自主的，发自内心的行为和做法。当你把承担责任当做一种兴趣，一种自觉性，自发性行为时，我相信，这时的你已经离成功不远了。

think of back through our lives, it was full of responsibilities. different roles have different responsibilities. when you are a student, it is your duty to study hard. as children, it is one"s duty to honor one"s parents. as friends, mutual concern is one"s responsibility. at the same time, i believe that responsibility is by no means empty words. in my eyes, responsibility should not be an mindfully required, but more so be autonomous, natural behavior, with practice. when you take responsibility as an goal, as an eventual of unconscious, natural behavior, i believe that you are not far from success.

我们的演讲完毕，谢谢大家。

thank you for your time.

l演讲稿 模板6

阅读小贴士：模板6共计7881个字，预计阅读时长20分钟。朗读需要40分钟，中速朗读53分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要72分钟，有109位用户喜欢。

mario cuomo: "a tale of two cities"

on behalf of theempirestateand the family ofnew york, i thank you for the great privilege of being able to address this convention. please allow me to skip the stories and the poetry and the temptation to deal in nice but vague rhetoric. let me instead use this valuable opportunity to deal immediately with questions that should determine this election and that we all know are vital to the american people.

ten days ago, president reagan admitted that although some people in this country seemed to be doing well nowadays, others were unhappy, even worried, about themselves, their families and their futures. the president said that he didn"t understand that fear. he said, "why, this country is a shining city on a hill." and the president is right. in many ways we are a shining city on a hill.

but the hard truth is that not everyone is sharing in this city"s splendor and glory. a shining city is perhaps all the president sees from the portico of the white house and the veranda of his ranch, where everyone seems to be doing well. but there"s another city; there"s another part to the shining the city; the part where some people can"t pay their mortgages, and most young people can"t afford one, where students can"t afford the education they need, and middle-class parents watch the dreams they hold for their children evaporate.

in this part of the city there are more poor than ever, more families in trouble, more and more people who need help but can"t find it. even worse: there are elderly people who tremble in the basements of the houses there. and there are people who sleep in the city streets, in the gutter, where the glitter doesn"t show. there are ghettos where thousands of young people, without a job or an education, give their lives away to drug dealers every day. there is despair, mr. president, in the faces that you don"t see, in the places that you don"t visit in your shining city.

in fact, mr. president, this is a nation --. mr. president you ought to know that this nation is more a "tale of two cities" than it is just a "shiningcityon a hill."

maybe, maybe, mr. president, if you visited some more places. maybe if you went to appalachia where some people still live in sheds, maybe if you went tolackawannawhere thousands of unemployed steel workers wonder why we subsidized foreign steel. maybe, maybe, mr. president, if you stopped in at a shelter in chicago and spoke to the homeless there; maybe, mr. president, if you asked a woman who had been denied the help she needed to feed her children because you said you needed the money for a ta_ break for a millionaire or for a missile we couldn"t afford to use.

maybe, maybe, mr. president. but i"m afraid not.

because, the truth is, ladies and gentlemen, that this is how we were warned it would be. president reagan told us from very the beginning that he believed in a kind of social darwinism. survival of the fittest. "government can"t do everything," we were told. "so it should settle for taking care of the strong and hope that economic ambition and charity will do the rest. make the rich richer -- and what falls from their table will be enough for the middle class and those who are trying desperately to work their way into the middle class."

you know, the republicans called it trickle-down when hoover tried it. now they call it supply side. but it"s the same shining city for those relative few who are lucky enough to live in its good neighborhoods. but for the people who are e_cluded -- for the people who are locked out -- all they can do is to stare from a distance at that city"s glimmering towers.

it"s an old story. it"s as old as our history. the difference between democrats and republicans has always been measured in courage and confidence. the republicans believe that the wagon train will not make it to the frontier unless some of the old, some of the young, some of the weak are left behind by the side of the trail. the strong, the strong they tell us will inherit the land.

we democrats believe in something else. we democrats believe that we can make it all the way with the whole family intact. and, we have more than once. ever since franklin roosevelt lifted himself from his wheelchair to lift this nation from its knees -- wagon train after wagon train -- to new frontiers of education, housing, peace; the whole family aboard, constantly reaching out to e_tend and enlarge that family; lifting them up into the wagon on the way; blacks and hispanics, and people of every ethnic group, and native americans -- all those struggling to build their families and claim some small share of america.

for nearly 50 years we carried them all to new levels of comfort, and security, and dignity, even affluence. and remember this, some of us in this room today are here only because this nation had that kind of confidence. and it would be wrong to forget that.

so, here we are at this convention to remind ourselves where we come from and to claim the future for ourselves and for our children. today our great democratic party, which has saved this nation from depression, from fascism, from racism, from corruption, is called upon to do it again -- this time to save the nation from confusion and division, from the threat of eventual fiscal disaster, and most of all from the fear of a nuclear holocaust.

that"s not going to be easy. mo udall is e_actly right, it"s not going to be easy. in order to succeed, we must answer our opponent"s polished and appealing rhetoric with a more telling reasonableness and rationality.

we must win this case on the merits. we must get the american public to look past the glitter, beyond the showmanship - to reality, to the hard substance of things. and we will do that not so much with speeches that sound good as with speeches that are good and sound. not so much with speeches that will bring people to their feet as with speeches that bring people to their senses. we must make the american people hear our "tale of two cities." we must convince them that we don"t have to settle for two cities, that we can have one city, indivisible, shining for all of its people.

now we will have no chance to do that if what comes out of this convention is a babel of arguing voices. if that"s what"s heard throughout the campaign - dissident voices from all sides - we will have no chance to tell our message. to succeed we will have to surrender small parts of our individual interests, to build a platform we can all stand on, at once, comfortably - proudly singing out the truth for the nation to hear, in chorus, its logic so clear and commanding that no slick commercial, no amount of geniality, no martial music will be able to muffle the sound of the truth. we democrats must unite.

we democrats must unite so that the entire nation can unite because surely the republicans won"t bring this country together. their policies divide the nation - into the lucky and the left-out, into the royalty and the rabble. the republicans are willing to treat that division as victory. they would cut this nation in half, into those temporarily better off and those worse off than before, and they would call that division recovery.

we should not, we should not be embarrassed or dismayed or chagrined if the process of unifying is difficult, even wrenching at times. remember that, unlike any other party, we embrace men and women of every color, every creed, every orientation, every economic class. in our family are gathered everyone from the abject poor of esse_ county in new york, to the enlightened affluent of the gold coasts at both ends of the nation. and in between is the heart of our constituency. the middle class -- the people not rich enough to be worry-free, but not poor enough to be on welfare. the middle class, those people who work for a living because they have to, not because some psychiatrist told them it was a convenient way to fill the interval between birth and eternity. white collar and blue collar. young professionals. men and women in small business desperate for the capital and contracts that they need to prove their worth.

we speak for the minorities who have not yet entered the mainstream. we speak for ethnics who want to add their culture to the magnificent mosaic that is america. we speak, we speak for women who are indignant that this nation refuses to etch into its governmental commandments the simple rule "thou shalt not sin against equality," a rule so simple -- i was going to say, and i perhaps dare not but i will, it"s a commandment so simple it can be spelled in three letters -- e.r.a.!

we speak for young people demanding an education and a future. we speak for senior citizens who are terrorized by the idea that their only security - their social security - is being threatened. we speak for millions of reasoning people fighting to preserve our environment from greed and from stupidity. and we speak for reasonable people who are fighting to preserve our very e_istence from a macho intransigence that refuses to make intelligent attempts to discuss the possibility of nuclear holocaust with our enemy. they refuse. they refuse, because they believe we can pile missiles so high that they will pierce the clouds and the sight of them will frighten our enemies into submission.

now we"re proud of this diversity as democrats. we"re grateful for it. we don"t have to manufacture it the way the republicans will ne_t month in dallas, by propping up mannequin delegates on the convention floor. but while we"re proud of this diversity as democrats, we pay a price for it. the different people that we represent have different points of view. and sometimes they compete and even debate, and even argue. that"s what our primaries were all about. but now the primaries are over and it is time when we pick our candidates and our platform here to lock arms and move into this campaign together. if you need any more inspiration to put some small part of your own differences aside to create this consensus, all you need to do is to reflect on what the republican policy of divide and cajole has done to this land since 1980.

now the president has asked us to judge him on whether or not he"s fulfilled the promise he made four years ago. i believe that as democrats, we ought to accept that challenge. and, just for a moment let us consider what he has said and what he"s done. inflation is down since 1980. but not because of the supply- side miracle promised to us by the president. inflation was reduced the old-fashioned way, with a recession, the worst since 1932. we could have brought inflation down that way. how did he do it? fifty-five thousand bankruptcies. two years of massive unemployment. two hundred thousand farmers and ranchers forced off the land. more homeless than at any time since the great depression in 1932. more hungry, in this nation of enormous affluence, the united states of america, more hungry. more poor - most of them women - and he paid one more thing, a nearly $200 billion deficit threatening our future.

now we must make the american people understand this deficit because they don"t. the president"s deficit is a direct and dramatic repudiation of his promise to balance our budget by 1983. how large is it? the deficit is the largest in the history of this universe; president carter"s last budget had a deficit of less than one-third of this deficit. it is a deficit that, according to the president"s own fiscal adviser, may grow as high as $300 billion a year for "as far as the eye can see."

and, ladies and gentlemen, it is a debt so large that as much as one-half of our revenue from the income ta_ goes just to pay the interest. it is a mortgage on our children"s future that can be paid only in pain and that could bring this nation to its knees.

now don"t take my word for it - i"m a democrat.

ask the republican investment bankers on wall street what they think the chances of this recovery being permanent are. you see, if they"re not too embarrassed to tell you the truth, they"ll say that they are appalled and frightened by the president"s deficit. ask them what they think of our economy, now that it has been driven by the distorted value of the dollar back to its colonial condition - now we"re e_porting agricultural products and importing manufactured ones. ask those republican investment bankers what they e_pect the rate of interest to be a year from now. and ask them, if they dare tell you the truth you will hear from them, what they predict for the inflation rate a year from now, because of the deficit.

now, how important is this question of the deficit.

think about it practically: what chance would the republican candidate have had in 1980 if he had told the american people that he intended to pay for his so-called economic recovery with bankruptcies, unemployment, more homeless, more hungry and the largest government debt known to humankind? would american voters have signed the loan certificate for him on election day? of course not! that was an election won under false pretenses. it was won with smoke and mirrors and illusions. and that"s the kind of recovery we have now as well.

and what about foreign policy? they said that they would make us and the whole world safer. they say they have. by creating the largest defense budget in history, one that even they now admit is e_cessive. by escalating to a frenzy the nuclear arms race. by incendiary rhetoric. by refusing to discuss peace with our enemies. by the loss of 279 young americans in lebanon in pursuit of a plan and a policy that no one can find or describe.

we give money to latin american governments that murder nuns, and then we lie about it. we have been less than zealous in support of our only real friend, it seems to me, we have in the middle east, the one democracy there, our flesh and blood ally, the state of israel. our foreign policy drifts with no real direction, other than an hysterical commitment to an arms race that leads nowhere - if we"re lucky. and if we"re not, it could lead us into bankruptcy or war.

of course we must have a strong defense!

of course democrats are for a strong defense. of course democrats believe that there are times when we must stand and fight. and we have. thousands of us have paid for freedom with our lives. but always - when this country has been at its best - our purposes were clear. now they"re not. now our allies are as confused as our enemies. now we have no real commitment to our friends or to our ideals - not to human rights, not to the refuseniks, not to sakharov, not to bishop tutu and the others struggling for freedom in south africa.

we have in the last few years spent more than we can afford. we have pounded our chests and made bold speeches. but we lost 279 young americans in lebanon and we live behind sand bags in washington. how can anyone say that we are stronger, safer, or better?

that is the republican record.

that its disastrous quality is not more fully understood by the american people i can only attribute to the president"s amiability and the failure by some to separate the salesman from the product.

and, now it"s up to us. now it"s now up to you and me to make the case to america. and to remind americans that if they are not happy with all the president has done so far, they should consider how much worse it will be if he is left to his radical proclivities for another four years unrestrained. unrestrained.

if july brings back ann gorsuch burford - what can we e_pect of december? where would another four years take us? where would four years more take us? how much larger will the deficit be? how much deeper the cuts in programs for the struggling middle class and the poor to limit that deficit? how high will the interest rates be? how much more acid rain killing our forests and fouling our lakes? and, ladies and gentlemen, the nation must think of this: what kind of supreme court will we have? we must ask ourselves what kind of court and country will be fashioned by the man who believes in having government mandate people"s religion and morality?

the man who believes that trees pollute the environment, the man that believes that the laws against discrimination against people go too far. the man who threatens social security and medicaid and help for the disabled. how high will we pile the missiles? how much deeper will the gulf be between us and our enemies? and, ladies and gentlemen, will four years more make meaner the spirit of the american people?

this election will measure the record of the past four years. but more than that, it will answer the question of what kind of people we want to be.

we democrats still have a dream. we still believe in this nation"s future. and this is our answer to the question, this is our credo:

we believe in only the government we need but we insist on all the government we need. we believe in a government that is characterized by fairness and reasonableness, a reasonableness that goes beyond labels, that doesn"t distort or promise things that we know we can"t do.we believe in a government strong enough to use the words "love" and "compassion" and smart enough to convert our noblest aspirations into practical realities. we believe in encouraging the talented, but we believe that while survival of the fittest may be a good working description of the process of evolution, a government of humans should elevate itself to a higher order.

our government should be able to rise to the level to where it can fill the gaps left by chance or a wisdom we don"t fully understand. we would rather have laws written by the patron of this great city, the man called the "world"s most sincere democrat" - st. francis of assisi - than laws written by darwin.

we believe, we believe as democrats, that a society as blessed as ours, the most affluent democracy in the world"s history, one that can spend trillions on instruments of destruction, ought to be able to help the middle class in its struggle, ought to be able to find work for all who can do it, room at the table, shelter for the homeless, care for the elderly and infirm, and hope for the destitute. and we proclaim as loudly as we can the utter insanity of nuclear proliferation and the need for a nuclear freeze, if only to affirm the simple truth that peace is better than war because life is better than death.

we believe in firm but fair law and order. we believe proudly in the union movement. we believe in privacy for people, openness by government, we believe in civil rights, and we believe in human rights. we believe in a single fundamental idea that describes better than most te_tbooks and any speech that i could write what a proper government should be. the idea of family. mutuality. the sharing of benefits and burdens for the good of all. feeling one another"s pain. sharing one another"s blessings. reasonably, honestly, fairly - without respect to race, or se_, or geography or political affiliation.

we believe we must be the family of america, recognizing that at the heart of the matter we are bound one to another, that the problems of a retired school teacher in duluth are our problems. that the future of the child in buffalo is our future. that the struggle of a disabled man in boston to survive, and live decently, is our struggle. that the hunger of a woman in little rock is our hunger. that the failure anywhere to provide what reasonably we might, to avoid pain, is our failure.

now for 50 years, for 50 years we democrats created a better future for our children, using traditional democratic principles as a fi_ed beacon, giving us direction and purpose, but constantly innovating, adapting to new realities: roosevelt"s alphabet programs; truman"s nato and the gi bill of rights; kennedy"s intelligent ta_ incentives and the alliance for progress; johnson"s civil rights; carter"s human rights and the nearly miraculous camp david peace accord.

democrats did it, democrats did it - and democrats can do it again. we can build a future that deals with our deficit. remember this, that 50 years of progress under our principles never cost us what the last four years of stagnation have. and, we can deal with the deficit intelligently, by shared sacrifice, with all parts of the nation"s family contributing, building partnerships with the private sector, providing a sound defense without depriving ourselves of what we need to feed our children and care for our people.

we can have a future that provides for all the young of the present, by marrying common sense and compassion. we know we can, because we did it for nearly 50 years before 1980.

and we can do it again. if we do not forget. if we do not forget that this entire nation has profited by these progressive principles. that they helped lift up generations to the middle class and higher: gave us a chance to work, to go to college, to raise a family, to own a house, to be secure in our old age and, before that, to reach heights that our own parents would not have dared dream of.

that struggle to live with dignity is the real story of the shining city. and it"s a story, ladies and gentlemen, that i didn"t read in a book, or learn in a classroom. i saw it, and lived it. like many of you. i watched a small man with thick calluses on both hands work 15 and 16 hours a day. i saw him once literally bleed from the bottoms of his feet, a man who came here uneducated, alone, unable to speak the language, who taught me all i needed to know about faith and hard work by the simple eloquence of his e_ample. i learned about our kind of democracy from my father. and, i learned about our obligation to each other from him and from my mother. they asked only for a chance to work and to make the world better for their children and they asked to be protected in those moments when they would not be able to protect themselves. this nation and this nation"s government did that for them.

and that they were able to build a family and live in dignity and see one of their children go from behind their little grocery store in south jamaica on the other side of the tracks where he was born, to occupy the highest seat in the greatest state of the greatest nation in the only world we know, is an ineffably beautiful tribute to the democratic process.

and, ladies and gentlemen, on january 20, 1985, it will happen again. only on a much, much grander scale. we will have a new president of the united states, a democrat born not to the blood of kings but to the blood of pioneers and immigrants. and we will have america"s first woman vice president, the child of immigrants, and she, she, she will open with one magnificent stroke, a whole new frontier for the united states. now, it will happen.

it will happen - if we make it happen; if you and i can make it happen.

and i ask you now - ladies and gentlemen, brothers and sisters - for the good of all of us - for the love of this great nation, for the family of america - for the love of god. please, make this nation remember how futures are built.

thank you and god bless you.

l演讲稿 模板7

阅读小贴士：模板7共计3193个字，预计阅读时长8分钟。朗读需要16分钟，中速朗读22分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要30分钟，有125位用户喜欢。

i. introduction

for several years now the european union is discussing a possible enlargement, because several european countries have applied for membership in the eu. these are especially the former socialist countries in eastern europe, that have clearly turned towards the west since the collapse of the iron curtain. these countries are bulgaria, the baltic countries latvia, lithuania and estonia, poland, romania, the slovak republic, the czech republic, slovenia and hungary.

in addition turkey, cyprus and malta are trying for quite some time already to join the eu. these application are not to be accepted without any further deliberation because they do bring along some risks and the consequences are hard to distinguish therefore these countries are not very e_pected joining the european union in the near future and will therefore not be included in the following evaluation.

ii. risks and challenges

if we wants to evaluate the risks and challenges of an upcoming enlargement of the eu, we should first take into account e_periences gained during previous e_pansion which were to some e_tent comparable. here the southern e_pansion from 1986 should be mentioned where two economically pathetic countries sought admission to the then european community. the admission procedure of these two candidates, being spain and portugal, were lengthy and considered very problem bearing. especially the amount of produce that would add to the already e_isting agricultural over-production of the community was seen to be a problem since it would increase the load on the european budget.

but seen from a global economical perspective the joining of spain and portugal was overall positive for the ec and the two countries, although spain struggled with a further rise of unemployment and disparities within the community were further amplified.

the disparities within the union will most certainly increase when it comes to an eastern e_pansion, but the agricultural problem will not be an issue, because the candidates have not got their focus on agriculture, already because of their communist heritage which focused on industry rather than on agriculture or the tertiary sector.

in case of the approaching e_pansion towards eastern europe the union will have to resolve several problems, the most severe being without any doubt the financial one that will go along with the e_tension, estimated to be €5 - €6 billion annually, just for the technologically underdeveloped agriculture in the new member states.

the financial problem will also lead to a temporary discontent among the population of the e_isting members, since the financial load on the countries will cause budget cuts because the new members will undoubtedly belong to the payees rather than the payers. especially the mediterranean members, for instance italy, spain etc. fear cuts in their subsidies particularly the agricultural ones, and agriculture is already making up the biggest part of the eu′s budget.

of course it is also to be questioned whether with the joining of economically weak countries the economies of the "richer" members are not weakened.

what should be taken into consideration as well is the impact the joining will have on the population of the candidates, especially considering the rights they will gain when they are citizens of the european community. they do then have the right to settle and work anywhere within the community, this could lead to a large amount of people pouring into the old member countries trying to seek work there and make their living. and since most of the european countries are already struggling with high unemployment the high rates could be pushed up further and the discontent among the population could worsen, especially against the background of neo-nazis in germany and other countries such as britain or italy. off course this would only be a temporary problem, which would solve itself over time as the new members develop economically, but still this could prove to be a major issue.

of course their comes also a minor problem along with the e_pansion, this problem being even more languages than the twelve, already being used, in which eu communications would have to be carried out adding to the already huge administrative body of the european union and also causing further costs of the eu.

but because the e_pansion represents a political necessity one should also take into account the positive aspects caused by such a historic event. with the e_pansion the continent would take a huge step towards the ethnic integration within europe, different cultures would be facing each other and could also profit from each other. also the global competitiveness of the eu against the usa and asia would improve and another step towards global peace would be undertaken.

iii. changes in administration

it is obvious that an e_pansion potentially including ten countries would not be feasible without fundamental institutional reforms.

for instance with the e_isting structure of the union which allocates most of the power to the european council, where each member state has one vote, it would be imaginable that smaller members would have a majority over the larger members. e_cept for poland, which is by population comparable to spain and would consequently be a large member, all other candidates are relatively small in size an population.

another point is that with more than twenty members the decision finding and making process needs to be completely reconsidered, so it represents the actual size of the member countries in terms of population rather than giving each member a veto and especially one single vote. the e_isting voting and weighting system is also already making the decision finding process a painfully and lengthy one, another ten different opinions added to this would make it virtually impossible to come to an agreement that at least partially satisfies all members and is therefore being supported and not vetoed against.

a changed "legislature" would also keep the democratic thought that the entire eu is based on alive and not vanish it like the e_isting system.

what should also be pointed out is the fact that an increase in members could lead to new coalitions within the union and also increase competition among the individual countries. there are even critics that fear that an eastern e_pansion could lead to a shift in power towards the reunified germany, since the potential new members are already heavily bound and leaning towards germany.

what should also be considered is a change in european agricultural policy, which should actually be reformed already. the system of milk quotas, subsidies etc. which subsidises an over-production in many areas, just not to infuriate the farmers, because smaller farms would not be able to survive without the subsidies and the entire face of the european primary sector would change is completely outdated. this system could definitely no longer be kept up with even more farmers to support.

iv. successful without absorbing the new members?

it is obvious that this question needs to be answered with a clear no. the e_isting members of the eu are already being absorbed by it and they have all chosen this faith. the goals of the european union do state the loss of sovereignty in the areas of economic and currency politics, the latter one already realized, also in the political areas of social politics, education, research, consumer protection, health and also environmental issues. now one could argue how many of these goals need to be realized in order for the eu to be successful, from the british point of view for e_ample the cooperation in economic issues and the creation of the single market have already been enough, considering their opinion towards the maastricht treaty.

if one would see it from the british point of view the eu could be successful without absorbing the new members, but since most other countries would like to see the above mentioned goals implied and would like to realize the dream of de gaulle, adenauer and others of "the united states of europe", the new members would surrender a huge part of their sovereignty and consequently would be absorbed by the eu, especially considering that they will join in a couple of years at the earliest when european integration will hopefully have advanced beyond the point it is today.

another point one could consider is what would happen if the european integration would further advance up to the point of the united states of europe without any new countries joining. this would create another superpower alongside the usa and the then non-members would live in the shadow of the eu or whatever its name would be by that time and also be absorbed by the enormous power, in any terms, of their big neighbour just like the caribbean, canada and me_ico, even the entire americas are by the usa. so the conclusion drawn by this could be that the central and eastern european countries would be better off in any case if they joined the eu even if they had to surrender much of their sovereignty.

sources:

(1) http://www.europa.eu.int/ (march 17th, __)

(2) http://idw.tu-clausthal.de/public/zeige_pm.html?pmid=26445 (april 5th, __)

(3) informationen zur politischen bildung: europ?ische union (bpb, 1995)

(4) microsoft encarta 98

(5) mittel- und osteuropa auf dem weg in die europ?ische union (werner weidenfeld, verlag bertelsmann stiftung, 1996)

(6) http://www.e-politik.de/beitrag.cfm?beitrag_id=559 (april 1st, __)

risks and challenges of the eu e_pansion

l演讲稿 模板8

阅读小贴士：模板8共计863个字，预计阅读时长3分钟。朗读需要5分钟，中速朗读6分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要8分钟，有270位用户喜欢。

导读：communication is wonderful,hello,everybody! it is my great honor to behere to share my idea with you.first,i’d like to ask all of you,"what do you think is the word that has really changed our world?"after my serious

演讲稿：

communication is wonderful

hello, everybody! it is my great honor to be here to share my idea with you. first, i’d like to ask all of you, "what do you think is the word that has really changed our world ? "after my serious thinking, i draw a conclusion that it is the communication that has changed the world. the world is a world of communication. wherever and whenever we are, we communicate more or less everyday. and it has not only changed the animal world, but also changed human society.

in animal world, communication happens anytime and anywhere and, also, in different ways. for e_ample, ants use their feelers to tell the mates whether the place ahead is worth travelling. bees take the advantage of their dancing to show e_actly what they have found and where the food is. perhaps most surprising, even your pet dogs could wag their tails to e_press how happy they are. thanks to communication, animals are able to move without being lost , could find their food and survive in their world .

besides the great influence in animal world, communication also has changed human world and has pushed forward human civilization. we could trace back to the ancient time when our ancestor invented characters for communication . and than , language came . at that time, people could e_change their thoughts both by writing and speaking. in modern times , computer comes to our lives and communication takes place more conveniently and frequently. it is communication that makes people never feel lonely. it is by communication that we share significant information . and it is because of communication that people from different countries or in different races could be close friends and word peace become possible. if it not for communication, we couldn’t imagine what world we human beings live in .

ladies and gentlemen! because of the communication, the world of animal changes. the world of our human beings changes. where there is communication, there is change. without communication, we can never live until now; without communication, the world won’t bedeveloped; without communication, i even have no chance to stand here to communicate with you and to emphasize the importance of it. ladies and gentlemen! it is time we communicated, and it is high time for us to say "thank you" to communication!

l演讲稿 模板9

阅读小贴士：模板9共计632个字，预计阅读时长2分钟。朗读需要4分钟，中速朗读5分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要6分钟，有189位用户喜欢。

ted演讲：泰迪熊作客jimmy kimmel脱口秀

导演塞思·麦克法兰在20__年凭借一部搞笑喜剧电影《泰迪熊》大红大紫，本周早些时候，他装扮成泰迪熊的样子，做客脱口秀节目《吉米·坎摩尔秀》接受专访。

the star of ted - the top-grossing r-rated comedy of all time - made a brief appearance on kimmel"s late-night chatshow on tuesday to promote the film"s dvd and blu-ray release.

今年上映的电影《泰迪熊》是史上的限制级喜剧电影票房冠军。为了宣传电影的dvd和蓝光碟发布，身兼导演和电影中泰迪熊配音的麦克法兰出现在了周二晚的吉米深夜脱口秀节目上。

ted revealed that his new-found fame has been tough since the film came out, saying: "i was being mobbed, i had to run into a build-a-bear just to blend in."

泰迪熊在节目中讲述了自己在电影成功后感受到的成名的负担，他说道："我出门就被人围住了，不得不跑到‘造熊游乐园’里躲起来"。

ted演讲：泰迪熊作客jimmy kimmel脱口秀

when asked what he has in the pipeline, he said: "they offered me peter dinklage"s part on game of thrones, but i turned it down. they have dragons there and i"m highly flammable."

在被问到目前正在进行中的事业，泰迪熊表示："《权力的游戏》剧组来找过我，让我演彼特·丁拉基扮演的小恶魔角色，不过我拒绝啦。那剧里有火龙，我可是沾火就着的。"

he also spoke about a possible sequel, saying: "we"re basically going to do the same movie, but in thailand, like the hangover."

当主持人问到会不会再拍一个续集《泰迪熊2》的时候，他回答到："我们打算拍一个基本一样的电影，不过打算在泰国拍，就像电影《宿醉》一样。"

l演讲稿 模板10

阅读小贴士：模板10共计225个字，预计阅读时长1分钟。朗读需要2分钟，中速朗读2分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要3分钟，有279位用户喜欢。

four seasons i love you的演讲稿

a year has four seasons. they are spring, summer, fall and winter. they are so different.

spring is warm and colorful. i can see many green threes and red flowers. some butterfly fly in them. the sun is shining, we can play in the park.

summer is very hot. the girls wear beautiful dress. the boys often go swimming in the pool. i can eat ice cream. it is delicious!

fall is a golden season. the weather is cool. there are a lot of fruits and i like them.

the last season is winter. it’s cold. in beijing sometimes it snows. i can play snow and make snowman. it’s a funny time!

oh! four seasons are all beautiful. you are so nice, i love you!

l演讲稿 模板11

阅读小贴士：模板11共计807个字，预计阅读时长3分钟。朗读需要5分钟，中速朗读6分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要8分钟，有247位用户喜欢。

judas ladygaga演讲稿

1. the story of judas begins on a freeway.a racing party jumps into our sight.

2. magdelene is sitting in the lead of the motorcyclsthe driver is jesus.magelene is lookingback.

3. .this is judas.

4. everyone knows it is dangerous to look back when racing .but why does magdelene do that

5. when judas’motorcycle runs in front of jesus’.madelene and judas look at each other.judas,jesus,and magdelene have unusual relationship.

6. this is john。he is one of the follower of jesus.but he is only a walk pass.

7. .magdelene laughs happily,so magdelene loves jesus very much.

8. the man on the right is jesus.

9. the group of people come to the base.because being the girlfriend of jesus,magelene is e_pected. t he group of people begin to dance together.

10. jesus is worried.

11. but judas is very happy now.he is kissing another woman.so he is philandering.perheps he doesn’t love magdelene at all.

12. judas is scornful but jesus is cowardly.

13. judas betrayes jesus.

14. jesus also wants to fight。but magdelene doesn’t want him to do so。because shi doesn’t want to see two man who she loves fights with each other.

15. judas failes.

16. in all shouting let jesus kill judas,magelene says she will kill him by herself.

17. magdelene is very disappointed because she loves the both two men.but she can only choose one of the two.

18. magdelene will kill judas but she doesn’t dare to look at his eyes.

19. magdelene is angry and disappointed.she wants to look at the man she loved deeply the last time and then end up his life.

20. when she looks at his eyes,there is less anger,the more is disappointed.there is a lipstick out of the gun..the lipstick means her love.

21. it means magdelene wants to kiss him but not to kill him.

22. but magdelene gives up.she loves a man she can’t love.

23. this is what magdelene thinks now.she wants the love sea to submerg her.

24. she falls down now.

25. magdelene is washing feet for jesus and she wants to get his forgiveness。

26. two brothers make peace.

27. jesus and magdelene are out of their senses.they want to compromise the people they love.

28. magdelene is very sad now.she wants to die instead of judas.

29. magdelene is making a decision.she must choose one of the two men..

30. at last,magdelene chooses jesus.she wants to face everything with him.

31. but every one is angry with magdelene.

32. at last,magdelene has to accept the stoning.

33. she dies.

l演讲稿 模板12

阅读小贴士：模板12共计2471个字，预计阅读时长7分钟。朗读需要13分钟，中速朗读17分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要23分钟，有205位用户喜欢。

尊敬的各位老师，同学们，大家下午好

我很荣幸能够成为数学club的创建者，也非常高兴能够有这么多的老师给予数学club这么多的重视，我真心的感谢关心数学club的各位老师以及各位同学。

时间飞逝，转眼间一年的时间过去了，数学club也伴随着我们走过了一年的光阴，回想当时，是李老师向我提出要建设数学社团，在这里真心的感谢李老师对我的信任。

今天，各位老师能够在百忙之中参加我们的社团换届会议，我在此表示衷心的感谢。

在建设社团的过程中，有人为了帮助我而加入到社团之中协助我管理社团，在这里对张皎、郑子璇两位同学的帮助表示衷心的感谢，让我能够在每一次要退缩的时候给予我真心的开导，让我能够坚持到现在。尤其是郑子璇在外面拉赞助受到委屈后，还要因为我管理的无能使她的任务加重，当她在电话中向我哭诉后却又劝我不要多想。在此真的感谢那些因为我而付出的各位。

在建设社团的过程中，我闹过许多情绪，许多人都能够原谅我的幼稚，在此感谢各位在各方面对我的谅解。

在建设社团的过程中，由于我的失职没能让社团立即进入让人满意的状态，但是还是有那么多的人支持着我支持着社团的发展，对社团充满希望，在此真心感谢各位对我以及对数学club的支持。

社团得到了这么多人的支持，我也在尽力的去做我所能够做的事情，在这一年中，我充分的利用了现有的资源，如在学院的30论坛上开辟了一个数学club版块，使全院学生能够与我们进行学习资料上的共享，另外，建立了一个数学club对外服务的qq群，为学院学生提供一些力所能及的服务。为了扩大我们的服务范围，我们将第七届"冲之杯"数学竞赛获奖选手全部加入到一个qq群中，在那里分享我所整理的数学竞赛资料，也算是为获奖的同学们提供一个相互沟通、交流的平台，希望那些学院数学竞赛获奖选手能够在近日的大连市高等数学竞赛中获得更好的成绩，为学院争得更多的荣誉。

在建设社团的过程中，我发现了许多不足之处。

首先，没有充分考虑到各个部门的心理状态，因为我一直都没有找到一个切实可行的方法给予各个部门相应的吸引力，通过我和新一届社长的分析，我们已经将下一年的计划大局打好，我相信下届的数学club的凝聚力至少是现在的三四倍。

其次，没有真正的深入的了解到学生们的内心的学习热情，上学期的对外讲课答疑活动就说明了许多，因此我想到了至关重要的一点，那就是许多学生在刚刚进入大学校园的时候都对学习充满了满腔热血的激情，都希望自己能够在大学的校园里努力取得一个骄人的成绩，但是随着时间的推移对学院学习状况的了解再加上身处环境之间的影响，许多人都慢慢的降低了自己的学习热情，而现在我想到的是我们就要在那些刚刚入学的新生们中间找到一个力量的突破口，那就是我建议并且得到了诸多老师及下届社长同意的趣味数学竞赛，并在刚刚开学的时候就开展一系列的宣传并且以院级的活动举行吸引大家参与到这个活动中来，进而对数学这门学科充满一个比较长期的激情。

以上种种不足或多或少会抑制到社团的快速发展，希望各位能够给予谅解，另外虽然我已经退出社团，但是我早已经将自己与社团溶为一体，无论我是否在社团，我也非常愿意为社团奉献出自己的一份力量，另外在这次暑假我也会处理好我应该做完的工作，在这里我对自己这次暑假的关于数学club的任务有如下几点安排：

第一， 我将整理数学club发展手册电子版，也许各位会为之感觉出奇，但是我认为我很有必要制作这个电子版手册，因为我感觉到我这一年的工作中对数学club的建设有了太多的了解和经验，希望这个发展手册的存在，数学club以后的运转能更好，我也真心希望这能够成为我们数学club发展的一个传统，我们把各自的经验记录在这里，让以后的管理者更有经验之谈。

第二， 数学精品课网站的后期整理。因为数学网站的工作整体布局都是我在整理，我也对网站的一些关键点的建设有自己的想法并已经突破了一些技术上的难题，我会尽力让大家满意，但是也为了网站在后期能够更好的发展，我也会对网站的一些文件的管理形成一个比较系统的说明文档。

第三， 数学公式编辑器的教程修改制作编辑。数学公式编辑器是数学方面比较常用的一个软件，说实话我一直都在写这个教程，现在我已经初步写了二十来页只是没有再次公开而已，在这次假期中我会将此编辑的更加详细以便更多的人能够很好的运用，我也会将我以往所写的一些错误给予修改，说实话给予我印象最深的就是导数的那个撇，我不希望我的错误导致别人写出来影响其美观效果但是我希望我的教程的出现能够给予许多人方便，同时数学公式编辑器也是学术部必备的一个软件，也是让学术部的那些需要的人能够更容易的上手。

第四， 数学te_语句的编辑语法知识。在弄数学精品课网站的时候，我产生了一个想法，那就是我能不能在网页上直接显示公式内容而不必用图片或者pdf文件代替，通过我对资料的查找，我真的找到了一个办法，那就是使用te_语言，我会在这个假期整理网站的时候将te_一些常用知识写成一个对应表，以便以后的人能够对其进行更好更方便的运用。

第五， __年学院组织培训笔记形成电子版。记得在去年的这个时候，我将学院组织"冲之杯"数学竞赛获奖同学培训老师所讲的内容形成电子版笔记并发给一部分同学，尽自己的力量为大家提供帮助，因为女生心细的特点，在这次培训中魏鸣做了全程纸张版笔记，我会在暑假的时候将其整理成电子版并提供给社团以便在以后为__级新生提供更好的服务，另外我希望我们社团每一年都能够进行相关的整理，按照我的设想也许不久的将来我们数学club就可以制作出一个针对数学竞赛的电子书籍。

说完自己的工作设想，我还是想为社团提出几点希望.

第一，希望社团能够协助老师做些力所能及的事务

第二，希望社团能够更好的激励社团学生，让社团对部员更具有吸引力

第三，希望社团能够尽力提升学院中主要是计算机系、信管系、嵌入式系对数学学习的热情

第四，希望社团能够为喜欢数学或想提高数学成绩的同学提供很好的平台

尽管我已经离开社团，但是仍然希望社团成员能够把我乃至我们当成社团的家人一样，衷心的希望数学club能够建设的更好达到建设社团的目的，在这里再次感谢各位对我以及对社团的支持，谢谢大家。

l演讲稿 模板13

阅读小贴士：模板13共计613个字，预计阅读时长2分钟。朗读需要4分钟，中速朗读5分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要6分钟，有136位用户喜欢。

i love my home （family）演讲稿

i love my home .there are eleven people in my family. all of us are happy every day.

i have a big family and a small family. the small family is me and my mother, also my dear father in heaven. the big family contains my maternal grandparents, my aunt, my uncle and my cousin. when we don’t（didn’t） have our own house, they let us live with them. and all of them took good care of us.

my mother is beautiful and kind, and she is a staff at a very big company. she can write very well. she is very strict on （with） me, but she loves me very much. she tells me that she loves me every day.

my father is very intelligent; he is an e_pert in his signory. he loves me very much .although he passed away of illness, i still fell （feel） that he and his love accompanies （will accompany） with me and my mother everyday.

my maternal grandmother was a teacher before she retired. she is very amiable. my maternal grandfather is very healthy----he can walk very fast, just like a young man. he accompanies me to the school until i was grade 4.

my aunt is very beautiful, my uncle is very e_cellent. he is a software e_pert. they have a little baby called dangdang. he is three years old. he is very naughty and clever. sometimes he can make you very angry, and sometimes he can make you laugh.

and recently, we moved into our new home in october 1st. i am very glad to have my own room. and, i have a tv in my own room and i like the ics channel it. in the past four years, we lived with them happily. every week we get together to have a big meal and play with each other.

all in all, having a united big family is the happiest thing in my life. they are also the greatest wealth of me. i love my family and my home forever!

《i love my home （family）演讲稿》出自：酷猫写作范文网

l演讲稿 模板14

阅读小贴士：模板14共计289个字，预计阅读时长1分钟。朗读需要2分钟，中速朗读2分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要3分钟，有245位用户喜欢。

300字英语演讲稿范文：my school dag

i"m jim.i"m 13 years old and i study in no.1 middle school.my school is very beautiful.every morning i get up at seven and have breakfast.and then i go to school at half past seven.lessons begin at eight o" clock. we have four lessons in the morning and chinese is my favourite lesson.we usually have 10 minute"s break between two lessons and at about 12 o"ciock we finish our morning lessons.i have lunch at school at twelve thirty.i like schooi lunch and i always have rice with meat and vegetables.after lunch i often talk with my friends or play basketball with them.in the afternoon lessons start at half past one and finish at four o"ciock.i play games after school with my friends and then go home at half past four.in the evening i do my homework and then watch tv.at ten o"

l演讲稿 模板15

阅读小贴士：模板15共计1394个字，预计阅读时长4分钟。朗读需要7分钟，中速朗读10分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要13分钟，有140位用户喜欢。

演讲稿：i don"t like you,

亮叔

i don’t like you.

i was a good boy.

but it changed after i met a girl.

i was told that, if you want to win a girl’s heart.

you must destroy the heart of the boy she liked.

contest chair, my fellow girls,

my boy is _iaoming, a real bad boy who enjoys smoking.

he smoked 1 cigarette every day, i smoked 2.

he smoked in the toilet, i smoked in the classroom

finally, she was attracted by me, it’s not a girl but a lady.

it is my teacher.

i stood like a soldier in her office for a whole day.

after going out the office, i saw the girl.

she looked at my eyes, and said, you are just like my smoker father.

i don’t like you.

in the following years, i became a badboy, i always cater to girl’s pleasure, regards them as my treasure, but theynever say to me: sure.

girls refused me again and again. they always said, i don’t like you.

my friends, what would you do when you are refused by the girls you loved?

i got a good idea to prevent this heart-breaking thing happen again.

that is,

just give up. who said a boy must need a girlfriend?

when i was focused on others but not girls, i found the life, is very boring.

so i got an internship in a famous chemical engineering company after graduation.

leon is the manager, he looks like a panda, but this panda is not cute.

after 2 months internship, i did a presentation to win the chance to be a formal employee.

i was for sure to get it. my material is very good, my delivering is very good, even my looks is also very good. however,

the panda didn’t think so, he sat in front of me, looked at my eyes, he said,

no data, no facts, no conclusion, murk, your presentation, is kind of grandstand, i don‘t like you.

you see, i was refused by my dream company. it is the first one, then i was turned down by the second one, third one.

i felt lost, from then on; i never go to see panda even i am living in chengdu.

my dear friends,

do you have the same problem? do you hear the same voice from others?

they said, i don’tlike you. when you are refused, you may feel lost, it’s difficult to build up the confidence again.

this time, i haveno choice, i just gave up.

because i need a job immediately, and then i got a job.

this company is not my dream, but it is special. there is a special club in the company.

after paying the membership fee, the club didn’t refuse me.

in my icebreaking speech, i told the story about the girls, about the panda, about the people who always refused me.

steven, a tough individual evaluator. he didn’t say idon’t like you because it’s one of the 5 taboos in a toastmaster meeting, but he refused my cc1 directly without any mercy.

he asked me, why are you focusing on others but not yourself when they say i don’t like you.

i was shocked by this question and couldn’t answer in that time.

i think over and over, something need to be changed， this is my life changing moment.

i quit smoking, and advise my father to quit smoking too.

i went to see real panda; it is really cute like leo.

i began to study toastmaster seriously to find the answer of that question.

oh, i got it,

when i wasre fused by girls, by the dream companies, even by evaluators, actually nobody refused me but myself, i refused myself to be a good boy, refused myself to bea good employee, refused myself to be a good toastmaster.

my friends, have you ever doubt yourself when somebody say i don’t like you? i have. even if we try to deny it as much as possible,but sometimes we are the person who reminds us to give up, we are the person whore fused ourselves to be a better man.

this time, i didn’t give up, i didn’t refuse myself anymore, i accept and open myself. i delivered my cc1 again, up to cc10. i discovered i could speak, i love speaking. the storytelling talent is inside of me, it made me to win the heart of a girl, it mademe to become a trainer in my company， it made me to stand here as a real toastmaster.

my dear friends, nobody but yourself is a barrier for your success, nobody but yourself can refuse you, let us stride the barrier, letus accept and open ourselves, let us become a better yourself.

and then, someday, someone will look at your eyes and say something to you,

i like you.

l演讲稿 模板16

阅读小贴士：模板16共计355个字，预计阅读时长1分钟。朗读需要2分钟，中速朗读3分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要4分钟，有117位用户喜欢。

300字英语演讲稿范文：follow the fashion

nowadays more and more young people prefer to follow the fashion. the word "fashion" is generally used to mean style in clothing. they make people handsome and cool. also, fashion can be something strange. from that we can be different from others. but all of these can change from time to time. and valuable personal qualities and characters never change. so i think they are the true fashions.

helpful and warm-hearted is a kind of fashion because not everyone can be like that. if you are not willing to help others, it is difficult for you to get along well with others. if you can always have a lot of friends, you are fashionable.

love is always important in the world. many people around the world need care and love. if you can show you love to the people in need, you are fashionable.

to protect the environment is fashion. if you don"t use the plastic bags and do something to protect our earth, you are fashionable.

so let"s form good personal qualities. let"s follow the fashion.